The once and future Kirk
Hopefully future Kirk, anyway. Hinrich looked like his old self tonight for the Bulls, and quite unlike his more prevalent alter ego, the Mopey Iowan, who we had seen most of this season.
The Bulls need for offense was dire, as before tipoff Ben Gordon joined known scratches Deng and Duhon on the bench with a wrist injury. With so much production (and Duhon) unavailable, someone had to score and Hinrich was doing it in all ways, 4-5 from three, 6-6 from the line, hitting floaters and turnaround jumpers on his way to a career high 38 points (along with 10 assists and 7 rebounds).
Before Hinrich was piling on the points in the 2nd half, the first half story was a 2nd quarter surge led by Noah, Thomas, and Thabo, allowing the tantalizing correlation of young players and winning basketball. Naturally, we didn't see Tyrus in the 2nd half and Adrian Griffin played 27 minutes, otherwise such instances wouldn't be tantalizing. Or simply make sense.
Noah and Thabo did play plenty of minutes though (yet another game where Wallace watched the 4th from the bench, and rightfully so) with Noah especially looking good and even scoring on a few post-up opportunities.
Notice I've now mentioned both Noah and Hinrich posting up the Pacers. Shows what kind of game it was. The Pacers went small the entire game, starting Granger at the 4 and Foster at the 5. No shotblocking meant that the Bulls could drive into the lane whenever they wanted, and on offense the Pacers were sloppy (18 TOs) and disinterested outside of chucking 3-pointers. Jamaal Tinsley looked particularly uninspired, especially in contrast to the teams' first meeting in Indy when he abused Hinrich. Tonight was the other way around.
0 recs |
195
comments
Comments
9-2 gets us back to .500 by the All Star break*
Tonight reinforced who we thought and who we hoped our last three 1st round draft picks would be. So here's to wishing our "Young 3" get their playing time. Or help us God.
*Out of the games vs Phoenix, @ Golden State, @ Utah, vs New Orleans, if we can split'em and go 2-2, there is no reason why we can't be 26-26. We should not be losing to any other team before All-Star weekend.
by Orange Juice on Jan 24, 2008 12:13 AM CST 0 recs
we shouldnt
by JSlakov on
Jan 24, 2008 1:36 AM CST
up
0 recs
You can't
by sue369 on
Jan 24, 2008 7:37 AM CST
up
0 recs
never sount on this years team for anything
:-)
by Bluelou on
Jan 24, 2008 9:20 PM CST
up
0 recs
came straight home to post that one, huh
by bullshooter on
Jan 24, 2008 9:32 PM CST
up
0 recs
whoops
by bullshooter on
Jan 24, 2008 9:35 PM CST
up
0 recs
No shit sherlock.
by sue369 on
Jan 25, 2008 10:44 AM CST
up
0 recs
We should beat the Suns
We the Friday night game against Charlotte, but the team can just get a hotel for the night to be ready for the game Sat morning.
by NBA Observer on
Jan 24, 2008 8:51 AM CST
up
0 recs
The Suns
by sue369 on
Jan 24, 2008 8:58 AM CST
up
0 recs
blah
by NBA Observer on
Jan 24, 2008 10:41 AM CST
up
0 recs
Wallace will be late
by tyrus4prez on
Jan 24, 2008 8:59 AM CST
up
0 recs
Just Praying
by AGBallinisaHabit on Jan 24, 2008 2:15 AM CST 0 recs
If Duhon
by cranscape on
Jan 24, 2008 8:20 AM CST
up
0 recs
Agreed
Thabo and Hinrich are a very useful combination. Combine them with solid post players and a healthy Deng on the wing, and you might have a contending team. Duhon is a solid back-up but will probably never be starter material. That's OK, you need a good back-up.
Gordon appears to have hit his ceiling, they're bringing him off the bench and he's a free agent after this year. Do the math.
by Bayern Munich on
Jan 24, 2008 10:04 AM CST
up
0 recs
Noce rocks too
http://mundoalbiceleste.blogspot.com/2008/01/nba-news-surprise-in-boston-wins-for.html
by sivanjohn on Jan 24, 2008 2:51 AM CST 0 recs
8-19 from the field, including 2-8 from 3, 6-9 FT
by snley on
Jan 24, 2008 8:20 AM CST
up
0 recs
Why all the Noc hate all the time
All the Noc hate is ridiculous. I can't wait until all the fans like those here complain him out of town and he comes back to torch us on a competitive team.
Hell, he'd really help the Grizzlies even sans Pau, he's an effort guy who while not fabulously gifted, has enough of an IQ to make many smart moves when the team needs them.
I just don't get why everyone rags on Noc all the time. Personally, I'd keep him, and trade the more valuable Deng for someone who will be better than Deng. Luol is a gifted player, who isn't ridiculously athletic--but more so than Noc, but has no killer instinct. Luol's been around long enough that I don't think a Killer Instinct is just going to come to him. Work out a trade for a real star, or a few uber talented youngs for Deng is what I say (though I would avoid Deng for gimpy TMAC and might avoid Deng and change for Pau unless Memphis included some other young commodity)....
Noc makes a defensive lapse and leaves the 3 ball open at times, but he also draws plenty of charges and often gets a block and some baskets after a stupid mistake. It's just the fact that Noc is so energetic that we tend to notice his mistakes, while Deng falls asleep often in the 4th to little fanfare. Deng's not our superstar folks.....he's never been a ridiculous athlete, and while Deng's good at a bit of everything, he's really not great at anything and doesn't have the killer instinct that could make him the great player everyone expected him to be this year.....
I was in the minority this offseason saying this, now more folks are noticing the same but not quite as vocal about it and by this point next year when Deng has too high a contract for what he's worth when we have a similarly skilled (though slightly less so player--Noc behind him), we'll be stuck and Deng's value will drop.
Hell, I'd love to sign Deng this offseason and work out something to trade him to the Kings for Kevin Martin....Deng's likely got higher presumed market value since Chicago's a bigger market and Deng's gotten all the buzz, but Kevin Martin's the better player.....
by majoyenrac on
Jan 24, 2008 2:17 PM CST
up
0 recs
Deng complaints
I agree Deng is not going to become all-star or team leader. He has a nice game, good on D but not dominate and good on offense but lacks great handles, great offensive moves, and 3 pt shot to make him a go to guy every night
there is room on team I think for both Noc and Deng but they should not be untradable (and I don't believe Bulls would have not given up Deng if they could have got KG)
by NY Chicago Fan on
Jan 24, 2008 3:07 PM CST
up
0 recs
Agree with you wholeheartedly
Maybe we can buy him out and have him retire. I read today that Miami is discussing the same with Shaq, which might allow them to save their salary cap nightmare....(i think this was from hoopshype).
I think Pax doesn't want to part with Noc for Gasol (Which I can agree, since Pau is a fabulously gifted player who might need a motivator/energy scoring PF to keep him in gear)....Noah is an energy guy but too young....Noc is an Olympic Gold champion who would be well respected by Pau.
But I'd be fine parting with anyone for the right player. I think Deng's a higher value as he's slightly better but really much much younger (which drives up his value) and I don't think and haven't thought our production would be hurt too much if we had a healthy Noc replacing Deng, especially if we part Deng for a talented superstar (Kobe).
Pax f'd up. That whole discussion that Kobe trade talks weren't serious is a screen, the Bulls love being able to say that because we all think it's a big f-up, and the Lakers of course want to push that message because they want their fan base to remain committed to the best player in the league (and not think of him as the Benedict Arnold he portrayed all summer). I'm sure that we didn't make the trade because Pax loved Deng too much, trading Deng, Wallace, and pieces would have been a huge steal for us, but it's over with now....oh well.
Moving forward, we need to move forward, if the Gasol idea is dead, well then Pax should come out and say it's dead and we can talk about other guys we should fight to get. Much as I like healthy TMAC, and also likely unavailable.....
I don't want KIDD, too old, too inept as a scorer for our offensively deprived team....we don't have Vince and RJ playing alongside him (and look at their success?). Kidd's had a fabulous career, but surely we can find someone else who's say in their late 20's for our talented but misfitted group of young 20's.....
by majoyenrac on
Jan 24, 2008 3:51 PM CST
up
0 recs
The Noc hate probably isn't fair
The Bulls will get much better bang for their buck paying Deng 10-12.5 mil/year than they will paying Noc 8.5 mil/year. Deng may never be all that we want him to be, but he's still a potential All-Star who will probably be relatively underpaid.
By the way, Noc has not been the Bulls most consistent player this year, not that that really matters. Joe Smith has probably had the most non-terrible games this season, if you want to label that as consistency. Noc has thrown his fair share of absolute stinkers as well as his fair share of good games.
by snley on
Jan 24, 2008 4:16 PM CST
up
0 recs
meh
by NBA Observer on
Jan 24, 2008 4:48 PM CST
up
0 recs
Um, I think Deng is already outproducing Noc
Nocioni 2007-08 PER: 16.20
Granted, Nocioni has also carried the burden of being the heart of our team. Not sure how to compares that to Deng's season long battle w/ injuries.
by snley on
Jan 24, 2008 5:58 PM CST
up
0 recs
But
Deng hasn't had that luxury.
Plus PER is a skewed formula in my mind (something you can tell was thought up by a math guy--which I am as well). I buy a lot of stuff that can't always be measured as an important piece as well (Such as being confident enough to try to make plays in game changing situations--and often succeeding, regardless of how poor perhaps the first 15-20 minutes of play you had), deflections, charges, etc....stuff that Hollinger doesn't always grab from his too stat heavy statistic that ESPN has blabbed about ad nauseum so that many now think it's a be-all end all statistic.
Fact is Deng's good, Noc is good, less than 1.5 point PER difference isn't to me worth $5M more a year on a team striving to get that superstar player...I'd rather trade that borderline maybe eventual if everything goes right when it goes right depending on the players around him and how much he fills a leadership role guy like Deng. Deng's got the highest value (a bit too high for what I feel his eventual max production will be) so let's use his value as a bargaining chip to get a superstar (or combo of solid young players maybe from the Atlanta PF spots and picks for Deng and some of our also-rans (Khryapa, Griffin--and his locker room calming rep)....
by majoyenrac on
Jan 24, 2008 6:50 PM CST
up
0 recs
PER helps Noc
by your friendly BullsBlogger on
Jan 24, 2008 6:57 PM CST
up
0 recs
Only team hurting?
by alec on
Jan 24, 2008 7:20 PM CST
up
0 recs
I don't have the olympic +/- numbers
by your friendly BullsBlogger on
Jan 24, 2008 9:09 PM CST
up
0 recs
Tyrus with offense
But it is still opposing guards that have created the most problems for us on defense.
by NBA Observer on
Jan 25, 2008 8:53 AM CST
up
0 recs
Agree to disagree then
Again I think the ire is because of the wide open 3's when Noc does the double team at the paint, and the fact that Noc looks crazy and super energetic that we tend to notice his faults more.
He's no superstar, but he's a worthy star in my book, and is hardly this team's biggest problem, in fact I'd say he (and Joe Smith) have been the most consistent all year. Deng's been good, but has games where he gets numbers but doesn't play hard when the game matters most (Something PER doesn't measure, and he seemed a bit lost in th ehype the first month of the season if not more....I'm still waiting for Superstar Deng I guess--I like Deng, but I also don't think and have never thought he's as good as his hype).
Noc can have a crappy game, but come in in crunch time moments and make the important plays we need to get some wins.....that's far more important than PER of a guy like Deng who'll get the baskets early when they're easier, and then do little when they're harder (Even though he has the talent to do more when it's harder, he doesn't have that psyche).
I'm afraid we'll ahve to agree to disagree. It's your blog though, so feel free to disagree(I like the blog though :)).
by majoyenrac on
Jan 25, 2008 10:38 AM CST
up
0 recs
That small difference in PER says alot.
Any way you put it, Nocioni is clearly the lesser player. When you remove the smoke and mirrors of his grit and hustle, you can see he is a far lesser player. Deng will probably never be a superstar. He is, though, much more likely to earn the value of his next contract than Nocioni is to earn the value of his current contract. Would I be willing to see Deng go for an actual superstar? Absolutely, bring on the Kobe trade rumors again. Do I think Paxson should be shopping Deng? Fuck no.
by snley on
Jan 25, 2008 12:07 AM CST
up
0 recs
I like Deng
I'm not saying Noc is better than Deng, what I am saying is that Deng's value is far greater than Noc right now and the differences between the two aren't as night and day as it would be to compare say a Dwyane Wade to a Ricky Davis.....
It's more like comparing a Mike Miller and Ben Gordon (Mike's a taller player who can get boards and is a consistent scorer, whereas BG's a flashier player who can score a lot more points on good days than Miller (and do so more often) but can also wallow with some bad nights for several games on end). Gordon's likely got far higher trade value, but I'm not quite sold that he's the all out better player--though I as a fan want to think he is and respect BG more--even though I keep indicating trading BG, I think much of that has to do with our need for height.
by majoyenrac on
Jan 25, 2008 10:45 AM CST
up
0 recs
A tough team to predict
Before Memphis, I had personal hopes of the Bulls going 5-1 to close out the month of January, with the probable loss being Phoenix. Naturally, the Bulls were pounded by [sigh] Memphis. So much for predicting how to get a run going.
If this team struggles to win back-to-back games, how in the hell are they supposed to turn this season around? A win streak? A serious, competent run? Hah! I'll believe it when I see it.
On another note, very delightful to see Kirk and Noah post up good numbers, as well as Thabo in the lineup and even Tyrus getting some minutes. After a 38-point scorcher, I wonder if having Thabo bring up the ball on offense with Kirk at the 2 would be a worthy experiment.
by ForWhomTheBullTolls on Jan 24, 2008 3:15 AM CST 0 recs
One thing I'd like to check
by Freethefro on Jan 24, 2008 7:21 AM CST 0 recs
It'll be easier to figure out
by Scotter on
Jan 24, 2008 9:50 AM CST
up
0 recs
Nice work there
by Freethefro on
Jan 24, 2008 4:10 PM CST
up
0 recs
Of course
Maybe he read all my ragging on him accross the net (here and sportsline)--I like to think I make a difference--but yeah, it's good to see him score 20, let alone 38 and 10 and 6 or 8 boards or whatever it was. 20 points these days is a shocker for Kirk, so 38 was thrilling.
I hope it keeps up as I've been a big Hinrich fan (he was the glue guy for our team and the only unmovable piece until this year at least in my book), and I hope he gets back.
See what 1 game can do, it can give me hope.
I like the fact that Thabo and Noah seem to be contributing, hopefully I can see their next game (and hopefully it's not going to end up like the Memphis game).
by majoyenrac on Jan 24, 2008 7:43 AM CST 0 recs
A win is a win.
Very happy that Kirk had a good game and Noah is just playing kick ass ball right now.
I'm so glad Skiles is gone because we would never have had the chance to see what Thabo is doing for this team now. With Duhon still out I'm anxious to see how Thabo and Kirk play the next few games. Nice to see 52 points from them last night.
by sue369 on Jan 24, 2008 7:55 AM CST 0 recs
excuse me
Let's see how he plays against Charlotte and Phoenix...I know he probably won't get 38/10/7 again...but can he at least get somewhere close to 20-25/7/4?
Hopefully he won't have to because hopefully Ben will be back...
by ScottieCartwright on Jan 24, 2008 8:09 AM CST 0 recs
Awww, did your
by sue369 on
Jan 24, 2008 8:14 AM CST
up
0 recs
lol
by ScottieCartwright on
Jan 24, 2008 8:23 AM CST
up
0 recs
I hear ya.
by sue369 on
Jan 24, 2008 8:56 AM CST
up
0 recs
sorry about that...
by Lt.Dan on
Jan 24, 2008 11:57 AM CST
up
0 recs
Dude
by sue369 on
Jan 24, 2008 1:11 PM CST
up
0 recs
Dear Paxson, Dear Kerr
Ben Wallace. BEN Wallace. BEN WALLACE.
Do it PaxKerr. Wallace for Stoudemire. Suns are running out of time. So it Ben Wallace's trade value.
by NBA Observer on Jan 24, 2008 8:48 AM CST 0 recs
Why stop there?
by alec on
Jan 24, 2008 9:04 AM CST
up
0 recs
send Steve Kerr your mixtape
by your friendly BullsBlogger on
Jan 24, 2008 9:35 AM CST
up
0 recs
John Jackson reports that Ben Wallace
http://www.suntimes.com/sports/basketball/bulls/756947,CST-SPT-bullnt24.article
by alec on Jan 24, 2008 9:20 AM CST 0 recs
He also mentioned
by sue369 on
Jan 24, 2008 9:28 AM CST
up
0 recs
I know somebody out there
Yes others were late, too. Maybe that's why Viktor didn't get a garbage time minute? Gordon wasn't going to play anyway. Joe Smith--I'm beginning to wonder about, though.
by alec on
Jan 24, 2008 9:47 AM CST
up
0 recs
vet leadership
by your friendly BullsBlogger on
Jan 24, 2008 9:31 AM CST
up
0 recs
Please Pax
by tyrus4prez on Jan 24, 2008 9:38 AM CST 0 recs
If we can't get rid of BW
Does Boylan have the cojones to start the clearly superior player Noah over Wallace?
If he doesn't, then he should be fired.
by RogersPark Kris on
Jan 24, 2008 10:01 AM CST
up
0 recs
that will be the day
by tyrus4prez on
Jan 24, 2008 10:06 AM CST
up
0 recs
So true. Boylan can't, or won't
Maybe the Bulls are trying to attract all the old washed up players in the league to appeal to the older, richer fanbase who can afford the higher ticket prices. Damn Reinsdorf is a frickin' genius.
by philosoball on
Jan 24, 2008 10:15 AM CST
up
0 recs
Thabo has shown
by sue369 on
Jan 24, 2008 10:15 AM CST
up
0 recs
Can you thnk
I sure can't
by Option27 on
Jan 24, 2008 10:16 AM CST
up
0 recs
Probably a combination of both
by RogersPark Kris on
Jan 24, 2008 10:22 AM CST
up
0 recs
And he just had season-ending surgury.
by alec on
Jan 24, 2008 10:25 AM CST
up
0 recs
I think
I really wish Ben needed to have season ending surgery though
by Option27 on
Jan 24, 2008 10:31 AM CST
up
0 recs
does he really count?
by Lt.Dan on
Jan 24, 2008 11:59 AM CST
up
0 recs
So, Boylan dislikes Tyrus' play, right?
So let's recap:
Bulls make run against "super small" lineup w/ Noah, Thomas, Nocioni, Griffin and Thabo and then Kirk coming in for Thabo.
In the fourth, Pacers have a bigger lineup, but Thomas gets ousted because the Bulls want to play smaller.
Got it.
Good thing Thomas wasn't in there instead of Griffin, they might have won by more!!!
by tyger1147 on Jan 24, 2008 10:40 AM CST 0 recs
Looking bad for Tyrus
Tyrus can't win with the current staff. He was effective last night.
by NBA Observer on
Jan 24, 2008 10:45 AM CST
up
0 recs
why don't you ask boylan
by bullshooter on
Jan 24, 2008 10:49 AM CST
up
0 recs
Actually, what I think Boylan
When Boylan took Wallace out, he actually replaced him in the post with Griff...and the truth is, A-Drain completely had his way with the Pacer's tiny interior defense.
We may have wanted to see Tyrus (and Tyrus probably would have done a great job, after all, he'd just had a great 2nd quarter), but Griff did what Boylan wanted him to; the Bulls rebuilt their lead and went on to coast to victory.
by alec on
Jan 24, 2008 10:59 AM CST
up
0 recs
It may have looked like he was having his
by Scotter on
Jan 24, 2008 11:16 AM CST
up
0 recs
I'm pretty sure that 1-6
Hey, I was as pissed off as anyone to see him come in instead of Tyrus. I'm just offering what I think was Boylan's intention.
by alec on
Jan 24, 2008 11:26 AM CST
up
0 recs


